Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Alzheimers Dement ; 18(10): 1957-1968, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1701246

ABSTRACT

As research and services in the Mediterranean region continue to increase, so do opportunities for global collaboration. To support such collaborations, the Alzheimer's Association was due to hold its seventh Alzheimer's Association International Conference Satellite Symposium in Athens, Greece in 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting was held virtually, which enabled attendees from around the world to hear about research efforts in Greece and the surrounding Mediterranean countries. Research updates spanned understanding the biology of, treatments for, and care of people with Alzheimer's disease (AD_ and other dementias. Researchers in the Mediterranean region have outlined the local epidemiology of AD and dementia, and have identified regional populations that may expedite genetic studies. Development of biomarkers is expected to aid early and accurate diagnosis. Numerous efforts have been made to develop culturally specific interventions to both reduce risk of dementia, and to improve quality of life for people living with dementia.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , COVID-19 , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Pandemics , Biomarkers
3.
Psychogeriatrics ; 22(3): 402-412, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1673279

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic may have a disproportionate impact on people with dementia/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to isolation and loss of services. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in people living with dementia/MCI. Two authors searched major electronic databases from inception to June 2021 for observational studies investigating COVID-19 and NPS in people with dementia/MCI. Summary estimates of mean differences in NPS scores pre- versus post-COVID-19 were calculated using a random-effects model, weighting cases using inverse variance. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. From 2730 citations, 21 studies including 7139 patients (60.0% female, mean age 75.6 ± 7.9 years, 4.0% MCI) with dementia were evaluated in the review. Five studies found no changes in NPS, but in all other studies, an increase in at least one NPS or the pre-pandemic Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) score was found. The most common aggravated NPS were depression, anxiety, agitation, irritability, and apathy during lockdown, but 66.7% of the studies had a high bias. Seven studies including 420 patients (22.1% MCI) yielded enough data to be included in the meta-analysis. The mean follow-up time was 5.9 ± 1.5 weeks. The pooled increase in NPI score before compared to during COVID-19 was 3.85 (95% CI:0.43 to 7.27; P = 0.03; I2  = 82.4%). All studies had high risk of bias. These results were characterized by high heterogeneity, but there was no presence of publication bias. There is an increase in the worsening of NPS in people living with dementia/MCI during lockdown in the COVID pandemic. Future comparative studies are needed to elucidate whether a similar deterioration might occur in people without dementia/MCI.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cognitive Dysfunction , Dementia , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Communicable Disease Control , Dementia/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Pandemics
4.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 272(1): 95-105, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1202751

ABSTRACT

Τhe COVID-19 pandemic has mental health implications for both healthcare workforces and general population, particularly in regions heavily hit by the crisis. Τhe study aimed (i) to investigate anxiety- and depression severity differences between staff of a COVID-19 treatment unit (N = 84) and a hospital without such a unit (N = 55) in comparison to participants of a convenience general population online survey (N = 240) and (ii) to explore relations between such symptoms and hospital staff reaction to COVID-19 in a low COVID-19 burden setting. Anxiety was studied with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item in hospital workforces and with the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) in online survey participants. Depression symptoms were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in hospital employees and the HADS in the online survey sample. Symptoms were classified as absent/minimal, borderline abnormal or indicating clinical caseness. Staff reaction to COVID-19 was tapped with a 9-item-questionnaire and the 22-item Impact of Event Scale-revised (IES-R). Proper tests for differences and stepwise ordered logistic regression models were employed. Anxiety- and depression severity was higher in hospital workforces than in online survey participants (P < 0.05). Anxiety was more severe in frontline- compared to backstage employees (P < 0.001) was inversely correlated with age (P = 0.011) and positively with avoidance (P = 0.028). Both anxiety and depression symptoms related to intrusion symptoms (P < 0.001). Regarding the relatively long data collection period, an inverse association between crisis duration and depression symptoms was detected (P = 0.025). These observations point to the urgent need for distress-mitigating interventions for hospital workforces even in low COVID-19 burden settings.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Pandemics , Personnel, Hospital , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Humans , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
BJPsych Open ; 7(2): e59, 2021 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1099899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly spread worldwide, threatening public health and financial and social life. AIMS: The current study's aim was to determine the prevalence of psychological distress and post-traumatic stress symptoms in the Greek population during the first COVID-19 lockdown, and to detect potential correlates. METHOD: An anonymous online survey was conducted between 10 April and 4 May 2020, to collect information regarding people's psychological functioning and COVID-19-related perceptions. RESULTS: A total of 1443 individuals completed the survey; 293 (20%) reported clinically significant anxiety symptoms, 188 (12.9%) reported clinically significant depressive symptoms and 506 (36.4%) suffered from definite post-traumatic stress disorder. Anxiety symptoms were independently associated with female gender (ß = 1.281, 95% CI 0.808-1.755, P < 0.001), educational level (ß = -1.570, 95% CI -2.546 to -0.595, P = 0.002), perceived severity (ß = -1.745, 95% CI -3.146 to -0.344, P = 0.015) and COVID-19-related worry (ß = 7.633, 95% CI 6.206-9.060, P < 0.001). Depressive symptoms were strongly correlated with educational level (ß = -1.298, 95% CI -2.220 to -0.377, P = 0.006), perceived severity (ß = -1.331, 95% CI -2.579 to -0.082, P = 0.037) and COVID-19-related worry (ß = 4.102, 95% CI 2.769-5.436, P < 0.001). Finally, post-traumatic stress symptoms were linked to female gender (ß = 6.451, 95% CI 4.602-8.299, P < 0.001), educational level (ß = -5.737, 95% CI -9.479 to -1.996, P = 0.003), psychiatric history (ß = -4.028, 95% CI -6.274 to -1.782, P < 0.001) and COVID-19-related worry (ß = 23.865, 95% CI 18.201-29.530, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of the population reported clinically important anxiety, depressive and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Women, less-educated individuals and people with a psychiatric history appeared more vulnerable to the pandemic's psychological impact.

6.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 79(1): 459-466, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have mental health implications for both people with neurocognitive disorder and their caregivers. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to shed light on relations between caregiver mental reaction to the pandemic and caregiver distress related to neuropsychiatric symptoms, memory impairment progression, and functional impairment of people with neurocognitive disorder during the period of confinement in Greece. METHODS: The study included caregivers of patients with mild (N = 13) and major (N = 54) neurocognitive disorder. The caregiver-based telephone interview was based on items of the neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire, the AD8 Dementia Screening Instrument, and the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale. Regarding the mental impact of the COVID-19 crisis on caregivers, four single questions referring to their worries in the last seven days were posed, in addition to the scales Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) and the 22-item Impact of Event Scale-revised (IES-R). A stepwise linear regression model was employed for studying the relationship between caregiver distress and demographic and clinical data and caregiver mental reaction to COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. RESULTS: Caregiver distress severity during the confinement period was influenced not only by memory deficits (p = 0.009) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (p < 0.001) of patients, but also by caregiver hyperarousal (p = 0.003) and avoidance symptoms (p = 0.033) and worries directly linked to the COVID-19 crisis (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: These observations provide further evidence for the urgent need for support of caregivers of patients with neurocognitive disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Neurocognitive Disorders/psychology , Neurocognitive Disorders/therapy , Quarantine/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurocognitive Disorders/epidemiology , Quarantine/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL